18 September 2020 Blog Post: The San Francisco "Miracle" and Need for Continued Vigilance
A thoughtful article was published this week by Dr. Martha Lincoln, a medical and cultural anthropologist at San Francisco State University. She points out (with numerous examples) that countries viewing themselves as “exceptional” or “outliers” have had worse public-health outcomes when it has come to COVID-19 response (link).
Similarly, San Francisco has been viewed as having an “exceptional” early response to coronavirus particularly at the outset of the pandemic. In fact, I have used the San Francisco Health Department as a example in my blog posts of a constructive epidemic response.
Their epidemic curve (presented below), with rates once 10 to 15 fold lower than those in Los Angeles suffered the same mid-July surge seen here. For the week ending 9/11, Los Angeles had 7.53 daily cases per 100,000 population; San Francisco 6.51.
Managing a respiratory pandemic requires singular and sustained focus. While we are all cheering lower numbers, these current rates are still too high. According to the Harvard Global Health Initiative, rates between 1-9 cases per 100,000 population require rigorous test and trace programs to ward off accelerated spread.
I think any of us when we take an objective look at COVID-19 testing, tracing and supported isolation efforts in California all know that we are hardly being rigorous. San Francisco did an amazing job in containing COVID-19 – until they didn’t.
𝗦𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗨𝗽 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿
Dig deeper into the health topics you care about most by signing up for our newsletter.
by submitting this form you indicate you have
read and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms
of Use. Please contact us to for us for more
information.
No comment yet, add your voice below!